Why Romeo and Juliet Aren't Twin Flames: Here's the Truth

William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is one of the most famous love stories ever written. With its powerful portrayal of passionate love, familial conflicts, sacrifices and tragic deaths, many people believe it is based on real events. And the story itself is often celebrated as a standard for what true love should be. However, both of these assumptions are incorrect.

Romeo and Juliet (1968)

Although the story feels so real because of its emotional resonance and relatable struggles, it is entirely a work of imagination. Its characters and events are not rooted in reality.

Romeo and Juliet is a fictional play written by William Shakespeare in the 16th century CE, designed to teach a valuable lesson about the power of love, the destructive nature of hate, the danger of impulsive decisions and the impact of family feud.

Shakespeare was inspired by earlier literary works, including Arthur Brooke’s The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet published in 1562, which itself was based on Pierre Boaistuau’s Histoire Tragique De Roméo et Juliette, a part of Histoires Tragiques, that was published in 1559. Boaistuau’s story is a French translation of Matteo Bandello's Italian tale.

Bandello’s Giulietta e Romeo, a part of Novelle collection, which was published in 1554, in turn, was influenced by Luigi da Porto’s earlier version, Giulietta e Romeo, a part of Historia novellamente rittrovata di due nobili amanti, which is completed in 1530.

The city of Verona, Italy, where the story of Romeo and Juliet takes place was indeed a real city founded in the 1st century BC. However, there is no historical documentation from the city of Verona that confirms the existence of the characters or events in Shakespeare’s play. 

Although Italian history is filled with stories of feud and rivalries among the noble families during the Middle Ages and Renaissance, there is no strong evidence that two families named Montagues and Capulets were involved in a real-life feud in Verona or in any other Italian city during that period.

While none of the characters and events in the play are historical, Verona has adapted the myth of Romeo and Juliet to boost its tourism. They capitalize on its association with Shakespeare’s play by offering tourist sites related to the story, such as Juliet’s house, Juliet’s tomb and Romeo’s house.

The Myth of Jesus' Bloodline Through Mary Magdalene: Why It's Not True

There is no descendant of Jesus Christ because Yeshua never married and fathered biological children. 

The concept that Yeshua married Mary Magdalene and had kids is a complete fabrication, with no credible foundation in history or scripture. This notion has gained attention through fictional works, including books and films, but when we turn to the Bible and other historical writings, there is no evidence to suggest that Jesus had a wife or children.

Here's the proof:

1. Scientific Point of View

From a scientific point of view, there is no evidence to support the claim that Jesus Christ had biological descendants. While some popular books and documentaries have suggested the idea, the scientific community requires solid proof through DNA, archaeological findings, or historical records, and none currently exist.

Firstly, there is no genetic evidence linked to Jesus or any supposed descendants. Scientists rely on DNA to trace ancestry, but since there is no known biological material from Jesus, there is nothing to compare or test. Without a verified DNA sample from Jesus, it is impossible to scientifically prove that someone today is related to Him.

Secondly, archaeology has not uncovered any remains or objects that could be confidently identified as belonging to Jesus or His family. Some discoveries, like the Talpiot Tomb, have led to speculation, but experts agree that the names found there were common during that time, and no direct connection to Jesus has been proven.

Lastly, historical science depends on reliable documents, artifacts, and remains. In the case of Jesus’ bloodline, no such materials exist. Most historians and scientists agree that the idea of Jesus having children is based on speculation, not evidence.

In conclusion, science through genetics, archaeology, and historical research does not support the claim that Jesus had biological descendants. Until real, testable evidence is found, the scientific view will remain the same – there is no proof.

2. New Testament

Let the New Testament speak for itself. The 4 Gospels never mention that Yeshua and Mary Magdalene had children nor mention that Yeshua fell in love with Mary Magdalene after his resurrection.

What the Bible is telling us is that, after Yeshua rose from the dead, he remained on Earth for 40 days, focusing on his divine mission and preparing his apostles for their future mission before ascending to heaven.

Yes, it was Mary Magdalene who first witnessed the risen Jesus and was instructed by him to deliver the message to his apostles that he had risen. However, there is no indication in the Gospels that Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene had any romantic connection. And no point does it suggest that Jesus referred to her as his wife or that they had any such relationship. The focus remains on Jesus Christ telling Magdalene to share the news of his resurrection with His apostles.

During the 40 days after his resurrection, Jesus took the time to appear to his apostles to give them the mission to continue the work he started on Earth (Jn20:21). Yeshua also told them to make disciples, baptizing people in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.  (Mat28:19–20) Lastly, he told them to stay in Jerusalem until they received the Holy Spirit, who would empower them to spread his message to the world. (Acts1:8) After these 40 days, Jesus ascended to heaven in front of his apostles. It is not even mentioned in the New Testament that Yeshua bid goodbye to his alleged wife or children.

3. The Priory Sion, the source of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail and the Da Vinci Code

The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln published in 1982, and the Da Vinci Code, a novel of Dan Brown published in 2003, are considered works of speculation and fiction, not reliable historical accounts because their central reference point, which is The Priory of Sion, is proven to be fabricated. 

Unknown to many people, the Priory of Sion is not discovered, because it was only invented. It never existed as an ancient or medieval secret society. Instead, the Priory of Sion is a small organization that was officially registered under French law in Annemasse, France, on May 7, 1956 by Pierre Plantard and André Bonhomme. The official purpose of the Priory of Sion as stated in the 1956 registration is to conduct study and mutual aid work in both secular and Catholic traditional fields and to take undertake activities of a social, charitable and cultural nature. It was 1960s when Pierre Plantard reinvented a new identity of their group, without changing the legal registration. Here he begins claiming that the Priory of Sion was founded in 1099 in Jerusalem, and it was a secret society preserving the bloodline of Jesus Christ through Mary Magdalene. Around this time, he began to publicly claim that Merovingian kings (real early French kings from the 5th-8th century) are descendants of Jesus Christ. Suddenly, he put himself in the story, he said that he himself was a descendant of the Merovingians. Therefore, he had Jesus' bloodline.

No one took them seriously, even the French government, because they find it eccentric nonsense. And it wasn't breaking any laws to claim you're descended from Jesus or Pokemon, or anyone, especially if no one is affected.

In 1965, he and his friend, Philippe de Chérisey, created fake genealogies and documents and planted them in the Bibliothèque nationale de France. These documents falsely claimed that the Priory dated back to 1099 and was protecting the descendants of Jesus Christ. Among them were forged parchments allegedly discovered by Bérenger Saunière, the 19th-century priest of Rennes-le-Château, suggesting uncovered secrets to the bloodline of Jesus Christ. These documents became the infamous Dossiers Secrets d’Henri Lobineau. 

However, in 1971, Philippe de Chérisey privately admitted forging the parchments in a document titled Le Faux, but this is not yet public knowledge. It only became publicly known in the early 1990s.

And so, the story that Abbé Bérenger Saunière found secret parchments in his church in the late 1800s is a fiction. There is no historical evidence – no reports, diaries, or records, that Saunière found anything of the sort. Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Chérisey just created the fake parchments and planted it in the library to support their made-up story about the Priory of Sion and a bloodline of Jesus and Mary Magdalene.

Again, the public are still unaware that the documents was planted. Therefore, the deception of the masses continues.

One day, British authors Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln discovered the planted documents in the library. Believing them to be real, they published The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail in 1982 claiming Jesus married Magdalene, their descendants survived through the Merovingians and the Priory of Sion protected this bloodline. The book was a bestseller and influenced later works like The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown in 2003. Yes, the hoax gained traction after it was used as a foundation in books.

In 1993, Plantard made a huge mistake. During that time, Roger-Patrice Pelat, a wealthy French businessman and a close friend of then-President François Mitterrand, was involved in Pechiney-Triangle Affair, a political and financial scandal, and so of coursw, Pelat is under investigation of the French government. While examining Pelat's activities, Judge Thierry Jean-Pierre, who was overseeing the investigation, was informed that Pelat had been named as a Grand Master of the Priory of Sion in documents produced by Pierre Plantard. Plantard falsely inserted Pelat's name into his Priory of Sion forgeries. He claimed Pelat was a Grand Master of the Priory of Sion in one of the fake documents. Why did Plantard do that? Maybe he use Roger-Patrice Pelat's name as part of his strategy to gain credibility and sense of legitimacy. He tied the Priory to an influential figure to make hoax more convincing and attract more attention.

This alarmed French authorities, since Pelat had recently died in 1989, and his name being used in a so-called "secret society" tied to conspiracy theories triggered legal attention. French authorities searched Plantard's home, where they found fake documents, including bizarre claims about Plantard's royal lineage. Pierre Plantard was interrogated under oath. Sooner, Plantard, under pressure, confessed that he had fabricated the documents and the claims regarding Pelat's involvement with the Priory of Sion. This legal investigation officially exposes the Priory of Sion and the parchment as fabrications. So, books like The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail and The Da Vinci Code, which use the Priory of Sion as a source, are based on a lie.

While Plantard never stood up and said, “It was all a hoax.”, the combination of de Chérisey’s confession, the exposure of false claims involving Pelat and the evidence from the 1993 investigation led historians and journalists to conclude that the entire Priory of Sion narrative was fabricated.

4. The Lost Gospel by Simcha Jacobovici and Barrie Wilson

On November 12, 2014, investigative journalist Simcha Jacobovici and religious studies professor Barrie Wilson published a book called The Lost Gospel: Decoding the Ancient Text That Reveals Jesus' Marriage to Mary the Magdalene. In this book, they claimed that an old story, Joseph and Aseneth, is actually a secret story about Jesus and Mary Magdalene. They believe it tells how Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had two children.

The story is found in a 6th-century Syriac manuscript kept in the British Library. Normally, this text is seen as a Jewish tale about the Old Testament figure Joseph and his wife Aseneth. But the authors think Joseph stands for Jesus and Aseneth for Mary. They said early Christians used secret symbols to hide this message, and they used special technology to study the manuscript.

However, experts in early Christianity strongly disagree with this idea. Bart D. Ehrman, a well-known expert on the New Testament and an agnostic, said there is no proof the text is about Jesus or Mary. He explained that the manuscript never mentions Jesus or Mary Magdalene by name. In summary, Ehrman finds the methodology of The Lost Gospel highly problematic due to lacking credible historical support.

Other scholars also rejected the book. Richard Bauckham, a respected biblical scholar, said that the authors might have written the book as “an entertaining joke – a joke at the expense of those ‘Pauline Christians’ they so obviously detest.”  (Part 7 of his Assessing the Lost Gospel) That line shows that Bauckham believes the authors, Simcha Jacobovici and Barrie Wilson, have written the book not out of genuine historical conviction, but to provoke or undermine traditional (Pauline) Christianity.

These scholars believe The Lost Gospel is an example of pseudohistory, a story that sounds like history but isn’t based on real facts. Some even compared it to The Da Vinci Code, a popular novel that makes similar claims but is known to be fiction.

In the end, most experts say that The Lost Gospel does not prove Jesus was married. But the book still got a lot of attention because it made a shocking claim about Jesus.

5. Papyrus dubbed as The Gospel of Jesus' Wife by Karen L. King

On September 18, 2012, Harvard professor Karen L. King presented a small piece of papyrus written in the Coptic language during the 10th International Congress of Coptic Studies, held in Rome, Italy. The papyrus included the words: “Jesus said to them, ‘My wife…’” This caused significant attention and debate. Some wondered if it suggested that Jesus was married.

Karen King did not claim that the fragment proved Jesus had a wife. Instead, she defended the authenticity of the papyrus and suggested that it might be an ancient text, perhaps from an early Christian source. King argued that the fragment didn't necessarily indicate a historical claim about Jesus being married but suggested it could represent early Christian ideas or beliefs.

However, after further investigation, doubts about the papyrus's authenticity grew. Professor Francis Watson from Durham University argued that the text seemed to be copied from the Gospel of Thomas, an ancient Christian text. He suggested that the papyrus might be a modern forgery.

King, along with other scholars, began looking deeper into the origins of the fragment. In 2016, journalist Ariel Sabar from The Atlantic uncovered that the papyrus was traced back to a man named Walter Fritz, who had no proper background in ancient manuscripts. Through further investigation, it became clear that the fragment was likely forged.

After this evidence emerged, Karen King admitted that the authenticity of the papyrus was questionable and stated that the evidence now “tips the balance toward forgery.”  She is still a professor at Harvard Divinity School, though she no longer defends the fragment’s authenticity.

In the end, the “Gospel of Jesus’s Wife” turned out to be a modern fake. Despite this, the case remains important because it demonstrates how scholars, journalists and experts work together to uncover the truth.

6. The Talpiot Tomb

The Talpiot Tomb is a burial site discovered in Jerusalem in 1980. It contained several ossuaries, stone boxes used to hold bones, some of which had inscriptions on them, such as "Jesus son of Joseph," "Mary," and "Matthew."

This discovery led to widespread speculation that the tomb could belong to the family of Jesus of Nazareth. Some researchers, like filmmaker James Cameron and biblical scholar Simcha Jacobovici, suggested that the tomb might contain the remains of Jesus' family members, including Jesus himself. However, most archaeologists and scholars reject this theory. They argue that the names on the ossuaries were common at the time and do not provide definitive evidence linking them to Jesus of Nazareth. The tomb is believed to date to the 1st century CE, but this alone does not confirm it as the burial site of Jesus or his family.

Genetic analysis of the remains found in the Talpiot Tomb has not provided conclusive evidence that they belonged to Jesus' family. No DNA testing has been able to confirm any link between the individuals in the tomb and Jesus Christ. While experts in archaeology argue that the names found in the tomb were relatively common during that time in Jerusalem, and there is no definitive proof to connect them to Jesus’ family. Inscriptions like “Mary” and “Jesus” were widely used, making the connection tenuous at best.

In conclusion, while the Talpiot Tomb remains an interesting discovery, there is no scientific evidence to conclusively link it to Jesus or his relatives. The theory that it contains the remains of Jesus’ family is highly speculative and is not supported by mainstream archaeologists or geneticists.

7. New Testament scholars and historians

Furthermore, the claim that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene is also debunked by numerous New Testament scholars and historians. 

Bart Denton Ehrman, an American New Testament scholar, for instance, states, 'Most significant is a fact that cannot be overlooked or underestimated. In none of our early Christian sources is there any reference to Jesus' marriage or to his wife. This is true not only of the canonical gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, but of all other gospels and all other early Christian writings put together' (Ehrman, Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code, p. 153). 

Similarly, Ben Witherington III, an American Wesleyan-Arminian New Testament scholar, asserts, 'There is not a shred of historical evidence to suggest that Jesus was married' (Witherington, The Gospel Code, p. 17)."

Also Maurice Casey, a British New Testament scholar, did mention in his book Jesus of Nazareth: An Independent Historian’s Account of His Life and Teaching published in 2010 about the marital status of Jesus. On page 145, he writes: “Jesus is likely for example to have been in charge of the carpentry business, ensuring that it remained prosperous. This period may have lasted for several years. Jesus is not said to have married, nor are any children recorded. It is therefore virtually certain that he did not marry, and absolutely certain that he had no wife at the time of his ministry, and that he never had any children. Most attempts to present Jesus as married do not belong to serious scholarship.”

While Bart D. Ehrman, Ben Witherington III and Maurice Casey directly debunk the claim of Jesus Christ's marriage, many New Testament scholars who also reject it remain silent, focusing instead on his mission, teachings, death, and resurrection, which indirectly confirms his celibacy.

One of them is Elaine Pagels, an American historian of religion, explores early Christian writings that differ from the canonical gospels, such as the Gospel of Mary in her book The Gnostic Gospels published in 1979. There she discusses ideas about Mary Magdalene. Like in the Dialogue of the Savior where Mary Magdalene is said to be one of the three disciples chosen to receive special teaching and praises instead of Thomas and Matthew. But Pagels does not claim that Jesus was married to her. Her exploration of early texts does not support the idea that Jesus was married or had children.

8. The Gospel of Philip, a Gnostic text written around the mid-3rd century CE 

As recorded in the Gospel of Philip, a Gnostic text written around the mid-3rd century CE and was translated by Wesley W. Isenberg:

“There were three who always walked with the Lord: Mary, his mother, and her sister, and Magdalene, the one who was called his companion. His sister and his mother and his companion were each a Mary.”

Many people misunderstand the Gospel of Philip when it refers to Mary Magdalene as Jesus' “companion”. But if you study the text carefully, the Gospel of Philip uses a highly symbolic and mystical language which is a characteristic of Gnostic writings. 

For example:

“When Eve was still with Adam, death did not exist. When she was separated from him, death came into being. If he enters again and attains his former self, death will be no more.”

New Agers have used this text to explain the idea that Adam and Eve were split souls. But the Gospel of Philip never claim such thing. In reality, the text actually pertains to union and sudden separation of God and the soul. 

It simply states that before the fall, Adam lived in unity with God. When Adam sinned after being influenced by Eve, death entered the world. Through faith in Jesus Christ, that broken connection between man and God is restored, and we are no longer bound to spiritual death but offered eternal life with God.

Going back to Jesus and Mary Magdalene — the term “companion” in that context doesn’t necessarily mean “wife", it can also refer to a “spiritual partnership”.

The term “companion” comes from the Greek word “koinōnos” which means “partner”, often in a spiritual sense.

In Philippians 1:5, koinōnia was also used by Paul. It is written:

“for the PARTNERSHIP of you in the gospel from the first day until now.”

Transliteration:

“epi tē KOINŌNIA hymōn eis to euangelion apo tēs prōtēs hēmeras achri tou nyn.”

In Philippians 1:5, Paul thanks the believers for their "partnership (koinōnia) in the gospel," implying they are “koinōnoi” — partners in his mission.

So when Mary Magdalene is called Jesus’ “koinōnos”, it does not necessarily mean “wife” or “romantic partner”. In the context of Gnostic texts like the Gospel of Philip, it more likely means she was a “close spiritual companion” or “disciple”, someone who shared in divine knowledge with Jesus.

References:

1. The Priory of Sion - CBS News

2. The Priory of Sion's 1956 Original French Registration Document

3. Interview to Pierre Plantard on 1993 Admitting Roger-Patrice Pelat Was Never A Member Of The Priory of Sion

4. Philippe de Chérisey admitted to forging the parchments

5. Bart Ehrman review of 'The Lost Gospel' by Jacobovici and Wilson

6.  Assessing the Lost Gospels: Seven-part Critique of the Book by Richard Bauckham

7.  How a mysterious man fooled a Harvard scholar, named Karen Leigh King, into believing the 'Gospel of Jesus' Wife' was real - CNN

8. Gospel of Jesus' Wife is fake, claims expert - The Guardian

9. Karen King said that a 4th century fragment of papyrus contains the phrase 'Jesus said to them, 'My wife ...' - The Guardian

10. Elaine Pagels' The Gnostic Gospels (1979)

11. Gospel of Philip (translated into English by Wesley W. Isenberg)

12. The Gospel of Philip (translated into English by Marvin Meyer)

No Tools for the Soul: Why Hypnotherapists Can’t Locate Your Twin Flame

First of all, there is no such thing as different types of twin flames. There is only one type of twin flame connection. The real twin flame connection is about 2 spirits that were created together and were granted with 2 souls by God during conception. 

The idea of different types of twin flames originated from these hypnotherapists and regressionists who base their information solely on the descriptions and experiences provided by their clients, which are often influenced by the subconscious mind, during the session. Over time, it was adopted and amplified by spiritual teachers which complicates the simplicity and depth of the original concept.

Hypnotherapists and regressionists don’t even have tools, such as advanced technology, to observe or confirm the metaphysical aspects of the soul, such as its creation, structure, connections or journey. Instead, their methods depend on hypnosis and verbal communication. They only rely on what their clients are saying during the sessions.

During the session, hypnotherapists or regressionists help their client enter a relaxed state of mind. When these clients reach a calm and relaxed state, their subconscious mind becomes more accessible and active. That is when the regressionists will start asking questions and the client’s subconscious mind will answer.

It is important to understand that hypnotherapy or regression therapy are not objective facts, as they can be influenced by the subconscious mind, which includes imaginations, beliefs, emotions, suggestions and prior knowledge.

For instance, if a person comes into a regression therapy already influenced by the concept of twin flames, perhaps through media, books or spiritual communities, their subconscious mind may bring to surface the aspect of being a twin flame even in reality they are not.

If you go to a regression therapist, you might experience vivid imagery of your soul splitting into two. However, it doesn’t mean that your soul has literally split. This could symbolize deeper emotions or inner struggles. Like, for example, it could represent your sense of sadness, a struggle between feeling whole on your own and the desire to share your life with someone else, or your longing for completeness or connection with someone.

If you believe you are a twin flame and your extraterrestrial twin flame is living in a different world, your subconscious mind might entertain that idea and turn it into a realistic belief during the session. Your subconscious mind may create a vivid experience where you will see that this twin flame is watching over you from the other world. However, this is only a symbolic representation of your beliefs and emotions, not a literal reality.

If you are a believer of past lives and went to a hypnotherapy session. Then, your subconscious mind may give you experiences to align with that belief. If you are a believer of the Wakanda universe, your subconscious mind may give you Wakanda experiences during the session. That’s it.

If you are not focused on being a twin flame or past lives, your subconscious mind will not experience anything like those during the regression sessions.

Never trust all hypnotherapists because they can also lie, just like everyone else, to attract clients. Ethical ones are only few and I hope they will keep their values for the rest of their life.

Can Hypnotherapists Find Your Soulmate? The Truth About Their Limits

Hypnotherapy and regression therapy use hypnosis as a tool to help individuals access their subconscious mind to explore hidden fears, past memories, emotional blockages or unresolved conflicts. These therapeutic techniques are often sought by individuals looking for self-discovery and emotional healing. Some people, however, turn to these therapies in hopes of discovering their soulmate’s identity, with the belief that the subconscious holds hidden truths about spiritual connections and past lives.

While such ideas can be compelling, it is misleading, as these therapies are entirely subjective and do not involve any technology or scientific methods to identify a soulmate. Hypnotherapists and regressionists rely solely on verbal communication as their main tool during sessions. 

In regression therapy, the regressionist uses hypnosis to help clients enter into a deeply relaxed state to access their subconscious mind. Once this state is reached, the therapists will start asking questions to guide the client explore past experiences, memories, emotions and unresolved issues, such as addictive behaviors, negative core beliefs or phobias. As the client responds verbally, the therapist helps them understand and resolve hidden issues for healing and growth.

During the session, clients may experience memories they interpret as past lives. Some may feel they've uncovered deep connections with someone they believe to be their soulmate. While these memories may feel so real during the session, however, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are based on actual past lives or soulmates. Keep in mind that the subconscious mind is powerful and can generate vivid scenarios or images based on your desire, beliefs and emotional needs, even if they are not based on objective reality.

If you visit a regressionist with the intention of finding your soulmate, the idea of a soulmate may appear during the session. Even if you haven’t thought about it consciously, unresolved emotional issues, hidden desires, and needs related to love and relationships can cause the concept of a soulmate to emerge during the session.

Hypnotherapy and regression therapy can provide meaningful insight into emotional patterns or relationships, but they cannot objectively identify a soulmate. As I was saying, the therapist does not use any technological tools, such as a computer, to validate the memories or scenarios that arise during the session. Hypnotherapists and regressionists rely solely on what the client shares during the session. Any revelations about a soulmate or past life are shaped by personal beliefs and perceptions, without concrete evidence.

The therapist’s only role is to guide their clients through their subconscious journeys. But they do not have the right to confirm the experiences that occur during a session, as the experiences are subjective and rooted in the client’s subconscious mind.

The Soul Was Never Split: Debunking the Twin Flame Fantasy

Twin soul, also referred to as twin flames, are about 2 spirits that were created together by God that were granted with 2 souls during conception. They are not half souls. There is no scientific proof that you can share or split consciousness, and there is no historical and spiritual proof that you can split off a soul.

Here are the proofs that there is no half soul existing or ever existed.

1. In spiritual beliefs, consciousness is called the soul, while in scientific understanding, it is simply referred to as consciousness. Scientists generally believe that consciousness begins developing in the early stages of fetal development, with signs of awareness emerging around the third trimester, which is around 28 weeks. After birth, consciousness continues to grow as the brain matures. And so, consciousness cannot be shared or transferred between people, because it is tied to an individual brain’s development. It is unique to each individual. No two consciousness can be the same.
2. In deep spiritual beliefs, every human being possess a soul. And from that soul reside the masculine and feminine energy. You cannot exist with one energy alone. You need the two energy - masculine energy and feminine energy, to function and evolve. No matter how much spiritual work you do, you will not attain spiritual enlightenment if you are half soul, because you are not whole. Only whole soul can attain spiritual enlightenment.
3. Some people believe that splitting the soul originated in Greek mythology. Well, the actual and traditional Greek mythology does not say that humans were originally two-in-one beings with double bodies nor does it state that soul was split into 2. In traditional Greek mythology, humans were created by the gods mainly by Prometheus and Epimetheus, according to Hesiod. They were always described as individual beings, with one body each. There’s no mention of humans being split in two or having double bodies. That idea only appears in Plato’s Symposium, where Aristophanes tells a philosophical myth, not a literal one. It was meant to explain love and the feeling of longing for a soulmate, and not the actual origin of humanity in mythology.
4. Scholars already said that mythology is not real, which means to say that even Greek mythology never existed. Numerous Greek mythology enthusiast also affirm that Zeus, as a physical being, never existed. However, the gods are very real to the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greek gods believers don’t have physical or spiritual encounter with the Greek gods, they just assume their existence, and attributed the natural events, human experiences and even fate to the influence of their gods.
5. The Symposium of Plato is a work of fiction. The characters such as Socrates and Aristophanes are real historical figures. The drinking party is indeed an ancient Greek practice. Yes, the characters and event are based on reality, but not the dialogue. The dialogue is just an idea of Plato to share different perspectives on love through fictionalized discussions. The idea that Zeus split human beings into 2 never happen in ancient Greek history.
6. Many spiritual teachers are pointing out Adam and Eve, the first human being according to the Bible, as twin flames. They claim that Adam is hermaphrodite, but the Bible never supported such ideology. According to Genesis 2:21 KJV, “And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.” The Bible states that Adam is created first, while Eve was fashioned from one of Adam’s ribs. It was never said that God caused Adam to sleep, and split his soul into 2. Eve is a different creation taken from the ribs of Adam. Therefore, Eve received another soul, her very own soul.
7. Hypnotherapy and regression therapy are not an objective truths. Instead, they are subjective truths. Meaning, they rely solely on the client's subconscious mind being accessed throughout the session, which can be influenced by suggestions, memories, emotions, experiences, perceptions, beliefs and past traumas. The only role of hypnotherapists and regressionists is to help their client access their subconscious mind through hypnosis and verbal communication, guide them through the process and support them in uncovering and understanding their inner experiences. Hypnotherapists and regression therapists don’t have the right to confirm that their client is a twin flame, or the client is living in Wakanda universe in their past life, and such and such. They don’t even have an advanced technology, such a computer, to verify the creation of souls, during the session. How come most of them have been declaring that their client is a twin soul, or their client’s soul is created with 3–24 soulmates, or they saw their client’s soul created in an imaginary Monad, without using an advanced technology? They are simply mixing their personal spiritual belief into their professional work. Hypnotherapy and regression therapy are supposed to be a psychological practice, and not a spiritual exploration. Therefore, those practitioners who do that are liars.