There is no descendant of Jesus Christ because Yeshua never married and fathered biological children.
The concept that Yeshua married Mary Magdalene and had kids is a complete fabrication, with no credible foundation in history or scripture. This notion has gained attention through fictional works, including books and films, but when we turn to the Bible and other historical writings, there is no evidence to suggest that Jesus had a wife or children.
Here's the proof:
1. Scientific Point of View
From a scientific point of view, there is no evidence to support the claim that Jesus Christ had biological descendants. While some popular books and documentaries have suggested the idea, the scientific community requires solid proof through DNA, archaeological findings, or historical records, and none currently exist.
Firstly, there is no genetic evidence linked to Jesus or any supposed descendants. Scientists rely on DNA to trace ancestry, but since there is no known biological material from Jesus, there is nothing to compare or test. Without a verified DNA sample from Jesus, it is impossible to scientifically prove that someone today is related to Him.
Secondly, archaeology has not uncovered any remains or objects that could be confidently identified as belonging to Jesus or His family. Some discoveries, like the Talpiot Tomb, have led to speculation, but experts agree that the names found there were common during that time, and no direct connection to Jesus has been proven.
Lastly, historical science depends on reliable documents, artifacts, and remains. In the case of Jesus’ bloodline, no such materials exist. Most historians and scientists agree that the idea of Jesus having children is based on speculation, not evidence.
In conclusion, science through genetics, archaeology, and historical research does not support the claim that Jesus had biological descendants. Until real, testable evidence is found, the scientific view will remain the same – there is no proof.
2. New Testament
Let the New Testament speak for itself. The 4 Gospels never mention that Yeshua and Mary Magdalene had children nor mention that Yeshua fell in love with Mary Magdalene after his resurrection.
What the Bible is telling us is that, after Yeshua rose from the dead, he remained on Earth for 40 days, focusing on his divine mission and preparing his apostles for their future mission before ascending to heaven.
Yes, it was Mary Magdalene who first witnessed the risen Jesus and was instructed by him to deliver the message to his apostles that he had risen. However, there is no indication in the Gospels that Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene had any romantic connection. And no point does it suggest that Jesus referred to her as his wife or that they had any such relationship. The focus remains on Jesus Christ telling Magdalene to share the news of his resurrection with His apostles.
During the 40 days after his resurrection, Jesus took the time to appear to his apostles to give them the mission to continue the work he started on Earth (Jn20:21). Yeshua also told them to make disciples, baptizing people in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. (Mat28:19–20) Lastly, he told them to stay in Jerusalem until they received the Holy Spirit, who would empower them to spread his message to the world. (Acts1:8) After these 40 days, Jesus ascended to heaven in front of his apostles. It is not even mentioned in the New Testament that Yeshua bid goodbye to his alleged wife or children.
3. The Priory Sion, the source of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail and the Da Vinci Code
The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln published in 1982, and the Da Vinci Code, a novel of Dan Brown published in 2003, are considered works of speculation and fiction, not reliable historical accounts because their central reference point, which is The Priory of Sion, is proven to be fabricated.
Unknown to many people, the Priory of Sion is not discovered, because it was only invented. It never existed as an ancient or medieval secret society. Instead, the Priory of Sion is a small organization that was officially registered under French law in Annemasse, France, on May 7, 1956 by Pierre Plantard and André Bonhomme. The official purpose of the Priory of Sion as stated in the 1956 registration is to conduct study and mutual aid work in both secular and Catholic traditional fields and to take undertake activities of a social, charitable and cultural nature. It was 1960s when Pierre Plantard reinvented a new identity of their group, without changing the legal registration. Here he begins claiming that the Priory of Sion was founded in 1099 in Jerusalem, and it was a secret society preserving the bloodline of Jesus Christ through Mary Magdalene. Around this time, he began to publicly claim that Merovingian kings (real early French kings from the 5th-8th century) are descendants of Jesus Christ. Suddenly, he put himself in the story, he said that he himself was a descendant of the Merovingians. Therefore, he had Jesus' bloodline.
No one took them seriously, even the French government, because they find it eccentric nonsense. And it wasn't breaking any laws to claim you're descended from Jesus or Pokemon, or anyone, especially if no one is affected.
In 1965, he and his friend, Philippe de Chérisey, created fake genealogies and documents and planted them in the Bibliothèque nationale de France. These documents falsely claimed that the Priory dated back to 1099 and was protecting the descendants of Jesus Christ. Among them were forged parchments allegedly discovered by Bérenger Saunière, the 19th-century priest of Rennes-le-Château, suggesting uncovered secrets to the bloodline of Jesus Christ. These documents became the infamous Dossiers Secrets d’Henri Lobineau.
However, in 1971, Philippe de Chérisey privately admitted forging the parchments in a document titled Le Faux, but this is not yet public knowledge. It only became publicly known in the early 1990s.
And so, the story that Abbé Bérenger Saunière found secret parchments in his church in the late 1800s is a fiction. There is no historical evidence – no reports, diaries, or records, that Saunière found anything of the sort. Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Chérisey just created the fake parchments and planted it in the library to support their made-up story about the Priory of Sion and a bloodline of Jesus and Mary Magdalene.
Again, the public are still unaware that the documents was planted. Therefore, the deception of the masses continues.
One day, British authors Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln discovered the planted documents in the library. Believing them to be real, they published The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail in 1982 claiming Jesus married Magdalene, their descendants survived through the Merovingians and the Priory of Sion protected this bloodline. The book was a bestseller and influenced later works like The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown in 2003. Yes, the hoax gained traction after it was used as a foundation in books.
In 1993, Plantard made a huge mistake. During that time, Roger-Patrice Pelat, a wealthy French businessman and a close friend of then-President François Mitterrand, was involved in Pechiney-Triangle Affair, a political and financial scandal, and so of coursw, Pelat is under investigation of the French government. While examining Pelat's activities, Judge Thierry Jean-Pierre, who was overseeing the investigation, was informed that Pelat had been named as a Grand Master of the Priory of Sion in documents produced by Pierre Plantard. Plantard falsely inserted Pelat's name into his Priory of Sion forgeries. He claimed Pelat was a Grand Master of the Priory of Sion in one of the fake documents. Why did Plantard do that? Maybe he use Roger-Patrice Pelat's name as part of his strategy to gain credibility and sense of legitimacy. He tied the Priory to an influential figure to make hoax more convincing and attract more attention.
This alarmed French authorities, since Pelat had recently died in 1989, and his name being used in a so-called "secret society" tied to conspiracy theories triggered legal attention. French authorities searched Plantard's home, where they found fake documents, including bizarre claims about Plantard's royal lineage. Pierre Plantard was interrogated under oath. Sooner, Plantard, under pressure, confessed that he had fabricated the documents and the claims regarding Pelat's involvement with the Priory of Sion. This legal investigation officially exposes the Priory of Sion and the parchment as fabrications. So, books like The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail and The Da Vinci Code, which use the Priory of Sion as a source, are based on a lie.
While Plantard never stood up and said, “It was all a hoax.”, the combination of de Chérisey’s confession, the exposure of false claims involving Pelat and the evidence from the 1993 investigation led historians and journalists to conclude that the entire Priory of Sion narrative was fabricated.
4. The Lost Gospel by Simcha Jacobovici and Barrie Wilson
On November 12, 2014, investigative journalist Simcha Jacobovici and religious studies professor Barrie Wilson published a book called The Lost Gospel: Decoding the Ancient Text That Reveals Jesus' Marriage to Mary the Magdalene. In this book, they claimed that an old story, Joseph and Aseneth, is actually a secret story about Jesus and Mary Magdalene. They believe it tells how Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had two children.
The story is found in a 6th-century Syriac manuscript kept in the British Library. Normally, this text is seen as a Jewish tale about the Old Testament figure Joseph and his wife Aseneth. But the authors think Joseph stands for Jesus and Aseneth for Mary. They said early Christians used secret symbols to hide this message, and they used special technology to study the manuscript.
However, experts in early Christianity strongly disagree with this idea. Bart D. Ehrman, a well-known expert on the New Testament and an agnostic, said there is no proof the text is about Jesus or Mary. He explained that the manuscript never mentions Jesus or Mary Magdalene by name. In summary, Ehrman finds the methodology of The Lost Gospel highly problematic due to lacking credible historical support.
Other scholars also rejected the book. Richard Bauckham, a respected biblical scholar, said that the authors might have written the book as “an entertaining joke – a joke at the expense of those ‘Pauline Christians’ they so obviously detest.” (Part 7 of his Assessing the Lost Gospel) That line shows that Bauckham believes the authors, Simcha Jacobovici and Barrie Wilson, have written the book not out of genuine historical conviction, but to provoke or undermine traditional (Pauline) Christianity.
These scholars believe The Lost Gospel is an example of pseudohistory, a story that sounds like history but isn’t based on real facts. Some even compared it to The Da Vinci Code, a popular novel that makes similar claims but is known to be fiction.
In the end, most experts say that The Lost Gospel does not prove Jesus was married. But the book still got a lot of attention because it made a shocking claim about Jesus.
5. Papyrus dubbed as The Gospel of Jesus' Wife by Karen L. King
On September 18, 2012, Harvard professor Karen L. King presented a small piece of papyrus written in the Coptic language during the 10th International Congress of Coptic Studies, held in Rome, Italy. The papyrus included the words: “Jesus said to them, ‘My wife…’” This caused significant attention and debate. Some wondered if it suggested that Jesus was married.
Karen King did not claim that the fragment proved Jesus had a wife. Instead, she defended the authenticity of the papyrus and suggested that it might be an ancient text, perhaps from an early Christian source. King argued that the fragment didn't necessarily indicate a historical claim about Jesus being married but suggested it could represent early Christian ideas or beliefs.
However, after further investigation, doubts about the papyrus's authenticity grew. Professor Francis Watson from Durham University argued that the text seemed to be copied from the Gospel of Thomas, an ancient Christian text. He suggested that the papyrus might be a modern forgery.
King, along with other scholars, began looking deeper into the origins of the fragment. In 2016, journalist Ariel Sabar from The Atlantic uncovered that the papyrus was traced back to a man named Walter Fritz, who had no proper background in ancient manuscripts. Through further investigation, it became clear that the fragment was likely forged.
After this evidence emerged, Karen King admitted that the authenticity of the papyrus was questionable and stated that the evidence now “tips the balance toward forgery.” She is still a professor at Harvard Divinity School, though she no longer defends the fragment’s authenticity.
In the end, the “Gospel of Jesus’s Wife” turned out to be a modern fake. Despite this, the case remains important because it demonstrates how scholars, journalists and experts work together to uncover the truth.
6. The Talpiot Tomb
The Talpiot Tomb is a burial site discovered in Jerusalem in 1980. It contained several ossuaries, stone boxes used to hold bones, some of which had inscriptions on them, such as "Jesus son of Joseph," "Mary," and "Matthew."
This discovery led to widespread speculation that the tomb could belong to the family of Jesus of Nazareth. Some researchers, like filmmaker James Cameron and biblical scholar Simcha Jacobovici, suggested that the tomb might contain the remains of Jesus' family members, including Jesus himself. However, most archaeologists and scholars reject this theory. They argue that the names on the ossuaries were common at the time and do not provide definitive evidence linking them to Jesus of Nazareth. The tomb is believed to date to the 1st century CE, but this alone does not confirm it as the burial site of Jesus or his family.
Genetic analysis of the remains found in the Talpiot Tomb has not provided conclusive evidence that they belonged to Jesus' family. No DNA testing has been able to confirm any link between the individuals in the tomb and Jesus Christ. While experts in archaeology argue that the names found in the tomb were relatively common during that time in Jerusalem, and there is no definitive proof to connect them to Jesus’ family. Inscriptions like “Mary” and “Jesus” were widely used, making the connection tenuous at best.
In conclusion, while the Talpiot Tomb remains an interesting discovery, there is no scientific evidence to conclusively link it to Jesus or his relatives. The theory that it contains the remains of Jesus’ family is highly speculative and is not supported by mainstream archaeologists or geneticists.
7. New Testament scholars and historians
Furthermore, the claim that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene is also debunked by numerous New Testament scholars and historians.
Bart Denton Ehrman, an American New Testament scholar, for instance, states, 'Most significant is a fact that cannot be overlooked or underestimated. In none of our early Christian sources is there any reference to Jesus' marriage or to his wife. This is true not only of the canonical gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, but of all other gospels and all other early Christian writings put together' (Ehrman, Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code, p. 153).
Similarly, Ben Witherington III, an American Wesleyan-Arminian New Testament scholar, asserts, 'There is not a shred of historical evidence to suggest that Jesus was married' (Witherington, The Gospel Code, p. 17)."
Also Maurice Casey, a British New Testament scholar, did mention in his book Jesus of Nazareth: An Independent Historian’s Account of His Life and Teaching published in 2010 about the marital status of Jesus. On page 145, he writes: “Jesus is likely for example to have been in charge of the carpentry business, ensuring that it remained prosperous. This period may have lasted for several years. Jesus is not said to have married, nor are any children recorded. It is therefore virtually certain that he did not marry, and absolutely certain that he had no wife at the time of his ministry, and that he never had any children. Most attempts to present Jesus as married do not belong to serious scholarship.”
While Bart D. Ehrman, Ben Witherington III and Maurice Casey directly debunk the claim of Jesus Christ's marriage, many New Testament scholars who also reject it remain silent, focusing instead on his mission, teachings, death, and resurrection, which indirectly confirms his celibacy.
One of them is Elaine Pagels, an American historian of religion, explores early Christian writings that differ from the canonical gospels, such as the Gospel of Mary in her book The Gnostic Gospels published in 1979. There she discusses ideas about Mary Magdalene. Like in the Dialogue of the Savior where Mary Magdalene is said to be one of the three disciples chosen to receive special teaching and praises instead of Thomas and Matthew. But Pagels does not claim that Jesus was married to her. Her exploration of early texts does not support the idea that Jesus was married or had children.
8. The Gospel of Philip, a Gnostic text written around the mid-3rd century CE
As recorded in the Gospel of Philip, a Gnostic text written around the mid-3rd century CE and was translated by Wesley W. Isenberg:
“There were three who always walked with the Lord: Mary, his mother, and her sister, and Magdalene, the one who was called his companion. His sister and his mother and his companion were each a Mary.”
Many people misunderstand the Gospel of Philip when it refers to Mary Magdalene as Jesus' “companion”. But if you study the text carefully, the Gospel of Philip uses a highly symbolic and mystical language which is a characteristic of Gnostic writings.
For example:
“When Eve was still with Adam, death did not exist. When she was separated from him, death came into being. If he enters again and attains his former self, death will be no more.”
New Agers have used this text to explain the idea that Adam and Eve were split souls. But the Gospel of Philip never claim such thing. In reality, the text actually pertains to union and sudden separation of God and the soul.
It simply states that before the fall, Adam lived in unity with God. When Adam sinned after being influenced by Eve, death entered the world. Through faith in Jesus Christ, that broken connection between man and God is restored, and we are no longer bound to spiritual death but offered eternal life with God.
Going back to Jesus and Mary Magdalene — the term “companion” in that context doesn’t necessarily mean “wife", it can also refer to a “spiritual partnership”.
The term “companion” comes from the Greek word “koinōnos” which means “partner”, often in a spiritual sense.
In Philippians 1:5, koinōnia was also used by Paul. It is written:
“for the PARTNERSHIP of you in the gospel from the first day until now.”
Transliteration:
“epi tē KOINŌNIA hymōn eis to euangelion apo tēs prōtēs hēmeras achri tou nyn.”
In Philippians 1:5, Paul thanks the believers for their "partnership (koinōnia) in the gospel," implying they are “koinōnoi” — partners in his mission.
So when Mary Magdalene is called Jesus’ “koinōnos”, it does not necessarily mean “wife” or “romantic partner”. In the context of Gnostic texts like the Gospel of Philip, it more likely means she was a “close spiritual companion” or “disciple”, someone who shared in divine knowledge with Jesus.
References:
1. The Priory of Sion - CBS News
2. The Priory of Sion's 1956 Original French Registration Document
4. Philippe de Chérisey admitted to forging the parchments
5. Bart Ehrman review of 'The Lost Gospel' by Jacobovici and Wilson
6. Assessing the Lost Gospels: Seven-part Critique of the Book by Richard Bauckham
7. How a mysterious man fooled a Harvard scholar, named Karen Leigh King, into believing the 'Gospel of Jesus' Wife' was real - CNN
8. Gospel of Jesus' Wife is fake, claims expert - The Guardian
10. Elaine Pagels' The Gnostic Gospels (1979)
11. Gospel of Philip (translated into English by Wesley W. Isenberg)
12. The Gospel of Philip (translated into English by Marvin Meyer)
No comments:
Post a Comment